Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/28828
Autoria: Clemente, M.
Domingues, L.
Editor: Martinho, R., Rijo, R., Cruz-Cunha, M. M., Domingos, D., and Peres, E.
Data: 2023
Título próprio: Analysis of project management tools to support knowledge management
Volume: 219
Título e volume do livro: Procedia Computer Science
Paginação: 1769 - 1776
Título do evento: CENTERIS – International Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems / ProjMAN – International Conference on Project MANagement / HCist – International Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies 2022
Referência bibliográfica: Clemente, M., & Domingues, L. (2023). Analysis of project management tools to support knowledge management. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 1769-1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.472
ISSN: 1877-0509
DOI (Digital Object Identifier): 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.472
Palavras-chave: Project management
Knowledge management
Project management tools
Resumo: Knowledge Management is an essential element for the successful implementation of projects. Due to the temporary nature of the projects and the teams that participate in them, the transfer, integration, and management of knowledge among projects is vital to promote sharing best practices, and to avoid the repetition of previous mistakes, in order to increase the probability of success for the projects and the organization. For this reason, Project Management tools can play a significant role in supporting Knowledge Management. The goal of this paper is to analyze and evaluate the project management tools of the Gartner Leader quadrant (2019 Gartner Magic Quadrant) regarding their potential for the Capture, Storage, Sharing and Application of knowledge, according to the artifacts in the PMBOK [1], and determine which are the best options. Gartner's leader tools were compared to Confluence, referenced as a great choice for knowledge and project document management. For the development of the artifact was used the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology. The application that obtained the highest score was Targetprocess.
Arbitragem científica: yes
Acesso: Acesso Aberto
Aparece nas coleções:ISTAR-CRI - Comunicações a conferências internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro TamanhoFormato 
conferenceobject_93533.pdf682,61 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.